Disciplines & Use Cases
One platform across the entire value chain.
SolvxAI convenes the relevant disciplines on a single question, runs the independent parts in parallel, and returns one coherent answer — each finding attributed to its basis.
A tour through the core disciplines
Every question spans silos. So does SolvxAI.
Forecasts with the uncertainty surfaced, not buried.
An AI partner that runs the full reservoir workflow on your live wells — diagnosing, forecasting, and quantifying uncertainty in a focused session instead of a week of wrangling.
What it covers
Multi-segment Arps fits, phase-aware, batched across hundreds of wells with EUR and economic cutoffs.
Flow-regime identification and permeability, fracture half-length, and conductivity from rate and pressure history.
Single- and dual-porosity models for history-matching and forecasting under rate or BHP control.
Industry correlations and EOS tuning feeding every downstream calculation.
OOIP/OGIP estimation and recovery factors with the uncertainty made explicit.
P10/P50/P90 forecasts and survivor-bias-aware type curves.
Who shows up
Forecast a 200-well asset with uncertainty quantified and DCA and RTA cross-checked — in an afternoon.
Stimulation design checked against offset performance.
Design logic grounded in the actual reports — and design-check verdicts measured against the full offset database, not just the header data.
What it covers
Cluster efficiency and entry-friction balanced across the stage.
Pump and proppant schedules sized to the design intent.
Closure pressure and pad sizing from the diagnostic injection.
Geometry tied to the production response, not assumed.
Pass / review / fail against the full offset database.
Design economics contextualized against the play.
Who shows up
A design-check verdict tied to how the offsets actually produced.
Casing and deliverability checks against real histories.
Deterministic well-construction checks — casing loads reconciled against completion demands, de-risked with Monte Carlo, and drawn from offset well histories.
What it covers
Burst, collapse, and tension reconciled against completion MASP.
Drag, buckling, and hole-cleaning margins along the path.
Pore-pressure and fracture-gradient bounds for the section.
Geometry and completion checked against deliverability targets.
Design margins stress-tested across the uncertainty.
Drawn from offset well histories where available.
Who shows up
An auditable pass / review / fail on a well plan, against the offsets.
Ranked underperformers, with the evidence, before standup.
Surveillance that runs on a schedule — flagging underperformers with the evidence per well and recommending lift changes before you walk into the morning meeting.
What it covers
Inflow-outflow and flow behavior across the system.
Hagedorn-Brown, Beggs-Brill, and Gray with dynamic PVT.
ESP, gas lift, rod pump, and PCP design and health.
Candidates ranked with the evidence per well.
Critical-velocity and loading diagnostics flagged early.
Overnight surveillance, delivered to the team's inbox.
Who shows up
A ranked diagnostic in your inbox before standup — not a spreadsheet refresh.
Sequencing logic that integrates every constraint.
Development scenarios that weigh subsurface, infrastructure, and economics together — so the sequence reflects the real constraints, not one discipline's view.
What it covers
Develop-order reasoning across the asset.
Representative profiles for undeveloped locations.
Inventory forecast from the analog set.
Development cases compared on value and risk.
Subsurface, infrastructure, and fiscal terms together.
The recommendation, with the constraints named.
Who shows up
The highest-value development sequence — and exactly what constrains it.
The static picture, tied to the dynamic data.
Log interpretation that doesn't stop at the rock — tying porosity and saturation to how the wells actually produced, across the field.
What it covers
Porosity and water saturation via Archie, dual-water, Waxman-Smits.
Per-zone evaluation straight from LAS files.
Petrophysical parameters mapped across the field.
In-situ stress, pore pressure, and wellbore stability.
The static interpretation wired into the dynamic view.
Interpretation reconciled against production behavior.
Who shows up
An interpretation reconciled against offsets, with the connections made explicit.
Cash flows built on the engineering forecast.
Valuation that traces every dollar back to the wells — DCF models on the actual engineering forecast, with every assumption explicit and override-able.
What it covers
NPV, IRR, payout, and breakeven price from the production profile.
Drivers ranked, traceable to the wells.
PV-10 economics from reported or computed reserves.
Your deck, royalties, working interest, and severance tax.
Every input explicit and adjustable.
Delivered as a workbook with the formulas preserved.
Who shows up
A transparent cash flow with sensitivities traceable to the wells.
The terms that constrain and inform the engineering.
The commercial framework that shapes the engineering — lease and JOA terms, royalty and working-interest structures, surfaced and connected to the technical work.
What it covers
The agreements that govern the asset, made legible.
Allocations that flow straight into the economics.
Authorization-for-expenditure context for the spend.
Regulatory constraints surfaced alongside the engineering.
Terms pulled from the filings and contracts.
Commercial terms wired into the cash flow, not a silo.
Who shows up
Commercial terms that constrain and inform the engineering — not a separate silo.
…and the domains around them
The disciplines are the core. The domains complete the deal.
One system carries the question across all of them — and returns one answer.
Who it serves
Meets every member of the team where they work.
Asset Manager / Leadership
“Where does the asset stand, and what needs a decision?”
A decision-grade view across every discipline, drawn from live data — current and attributed, not a deck assembled overnight.
Reservoir Engineer
“Forecast these wells and quantify the uncertainty.”
A calibrated forecast with DCA and RTA cross-checked and assumptions explicit — a focused session, not a week of wrangling.
Production Engineer
“Flag the underperformers and intervention candidates.”
A ranked diagnostic with the evidence per well, before standup — backed by the historical data, not a spreadsheet refresh.
Completion Engineer
“Check this design against the offsets.”
Design-check verdicts against the full offset database, grounded in the actual completion reports and well histories.
Reserves / Commercial
“Build the economics with our price deck and terms.”
A transparent cash flow with every assumption override-able and reserves supported by the underlying engineering.*
Finance / Investment Banking
“Frame the valuation on the engineering forecast.”
Sensitivities traceable to the wells and formation-level assumptions — the technical and financial views integrated, not assembled separately.*
* Economics and reserves outputs support — they do not replace — a Qualified Reserves Evaluator and any required regulatory sign-off.
How it convenes
One question. Every discipline. One coherent answer.
Identify
It recognizes which disciplines a question touches.
Route
Sub-problems go to the right disciplinary reasoning.
Run in parallel
The independent parts run at the same time.
Reconcile
Findings merge into one attributed answer.
It does not hand off. It does not leave you to reconcile separate outputs. It integrates — and that integration is the work.